Government Review of Supermarket Unit Pricing: What It Could Mean for Your Business
Aspen Corp • 2 October 2025

Government Review of Supermarket Unit Pricing: What It Could Mean for Your Business

The Federal Government recently wrapped up a consultation process on supermarket unit pricing. While the topic might sound like a purely consumer issue, it could have very real commercial impacts for businesses supplying into the grocery sector.


On 1 September 2025, Treasury opened consultation on strengthening the Retail Grocery Industry (Unit Pricing) Code of Conduct. Submissions closed just a few weeks later on 19 September 2025, marking the end of a very short opportunity for stakeholders to have their say.


A Quick Recap

Unit pricing is what allows shoppers to compare costs per standard measure (e.g. $/100g or $/litre) across different pack sizes and brands. Since 2009, large supermarkets have been required to display this information to help customers spot value. While compliance has been relatively low-cost and penalties limited, the Government’s review signals that much tighter rules could be on the way.


Why Now?

The ACCC’s recent supermarket inquiry highlighted that while unit pricing helps, there are still gaps. The big concern is shrinkflation—when pack sizes quietly reduce while prices remain the same or higher. With cost-of-living pressures dominating headlines, the Government is looking at clearer, fairer pricing to rebuild consumer trust.


What Might Change?

Proposals considered in the consultation paper include:

  • Shrinkflation alerts – supermarkets may need to flag when a product becomes smaller without a matching price cut.
  • Clearer displays – larger, more prominent unit prices both in-store and online.
  • Wider coverage – expanding the rules beyond major supermarkets to smaller retailers and online sellers.
  • Standardised measures – eliminating confusing “per roll” vs “per sheet” comparisons.
  • Civil penalties – introducing fines for non-compliance.


The Commercial Impact

For suppliers, packaging decisions could come under closer scrutiny. For retailers, costs might arise from updating shelf labels, software, or e-commerce systems. But there are also opportunities: businesses that embrace transparency could build loyalty and stand out in a competitive market.


What You Should Do

Now that the consultation period has closed, Treasury will consider submissions and the Government is expected to announce its response later this year. Businesses in food, grocery, and household goods should stay alert—the final shape of the rules could affect pricing, packaging, and compliance obligations across the sector.


At Aspen  Corporate, we can help you model potential compliance costs, assess financial impacts, and prepare for upcoming regulatory change. Reach out to discuss how this review might affect your business.


by Aspen Corp 2 October 2025
Accessing superannuation funds for medical treatment or financial hardship
ATO Interest Charges Are No Longer Deductible – What You Can Do
by Aspen Corp 2 October 2025
Leaving debts outstanding with the ATO is now more expensive for many taxpayers, as GIC and SIC imposed by the ATO is no longer tax-deductible from 1 July 2025.
Trust Resolutions – Why Timing and Evidence Matter
by Aspen Corp 2 October 2025
A decision by the Administrative Review Tribunal highlights the importance of documentation and evidence when it comes to tax planning and the possible consequences
RBA cuts rates to 3.60%: what this means for you
by Aspen Corp 3 September 2025
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) delivered a 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the cash rate from 3.85% to 3.60%, the third reduction this year.
Superannuation guarantee: due dates and considerations for employees and employers
by Aspen Corp 3 September 2025
On 1 July 2025 the superannuation guarantee rate increased to 12% which is the final stage of a series of previously legislated increases.
Non-compete clauses: the next stage
by Aspen Corp 3 September 2025
The Governments intention is to ban non-compete clauses for low and middle-income employees and consult on the use of non-compete clauses for higher incomes.
More posts